Why repair slate instead of replacing the slope?
Because the material usually outlasts its fixings and its flashings. Park Service guidance on historic slate says repair wherever possible, and notes service lives of roughly 60 to 125 years for the slates common around 1900. Stripping a sound slope throws away the part of the roof with life left in it.
There is a practical reason too. Slate is heavy and brittle, and a slope that has sat undisturbed for a century does not enjoy being walked over and relaid. Minimum intervention is both the preservation answer and the sensible engineering one.
The exception is a slope where the slate itself has gone: delaminating, flaking, soft at the edges across the whole area. That is a genuine replacement case, and the Historical Commission's own reports describe replacement as contemplated where deterioration requires it, with exceptions for character-defining features like mansards and turrets.
What is nail sickness and why does it matter here?
It is the condition where slates are sound but their fixings have corroded, so individual slates slip one after another with no obvious damage to the stone. On a roof of this age it is the most common reason slates come off, and it explains why patching the same slope repeatedly stops working.
The tell is the pattern: slates slipping across an area rather than breaking where something hit them, often with rust marks on the face below the fixing line. A roofer should look at the nails that come out, not only at the slate going back.
The fix is relaying the affected section with non-ferrous nails, copper or stainless as the Park Service specifies. It costs more than putting slates back one at a time and it is the difference between a repair and an annual ritual.
Does slate work need Historical Commission review?
On a property in a historic district or on the Philadelphia Register, roof work visible from the public right-of-way may need review before Licenses and Inspections issues a permit. The Commission's roofs guidance favours work that is inconspicuous from the street. It confirms what applies to an address.
Its reports treat slate replacement as something contemplated where deterioration requires it, with exceptions for mansards, turrets and character-defining features, which is why documenting the condition matters: photographs of delaminating slate make a case that a general statement does not.
Repair in matching slate with concealed non-ferrous fixings is the least contentious approach available, which is another reason it is the default here. Our guide on slate and historic roofs in Philadelphia sets out how the process tends to run.
What goes wrong when slate is repaired badly?
Mortar, tar, mastic and visible metal straps across the face of slates are the classic bad repairs. Each sheds water for a season or two, then cracks, traps moisture against the slate and the fixings, and makes the next proper repair harder and more expensive than it needed to be.
Mismatched replacement pieces are the other common sin, especially where a different thickness has been forced into a course and has cracked its neighbours. On a street-facing slope on a designated building, that is also the kind of work that attracts attention in review.
If your roof already carries repairs like these, they are worth cataloguing during an inspection rather than ripping out in one go. A roofer can prioritise the ones that are actively causing damage and plan the rest, which is a far better use of money than a cosmetic sweep.